Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. The most common localizations are the stomach and small intestine. About 95% of GISTs show KIT protein expression. Conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy are not effective in treatment; thus, selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors are used. Since targeted molecular agents are employed in treatment, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is known to be very sensitive in assessing early response. It is known that progression-free survival is longer in-patient groups with an early response to treatment on F-18 FDG PET/CT. In cases where conventional radiologic imaging techniques are unclear in assessing disease progression, F-18 FDG PET/CT is also frequently used to detect recurrent disease. Metastases from malignant tumors of colorectal, ovarian, or gastric origin are often seen in the peritoneum. Primary peritoneal tumors (PPTs) are tumors that resemble stage III-IV serous ovarian carcinoma, originate from the peritoneum itself, are very rare, and have a very low survival rate. F-18 FDG PET/CT is recommended as the initial imaging modality in patients with suspected peritoneal mesothelioma (PM), which is one of the PPTs. F-18 FDG PET/CT also contributes with high sensitivity to the differential diagnosis of metastatic peritoneal carcinomatosis and PM. There are studies reporting that tumor metabolic response is correlated with progression-free survival in the assessment of treatment response in PM patients. This article discusses the role of molecular imaging methods in GISTs and PPTs.
Keywords:
Gastrointestinal stromal tumor, primary peritoneal tumor, F-18 FDG PET/CT
References
1
Crosby JA, Catton CN, Davis A, et al. Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the small intestine: a review of 50 cases from a prospective database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:50-59.
2
Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review Hum Pathol. 2002;33:478-483.
3
Casali PG, Blay JY, Abecassis N, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33:20-33.
4
Blay JY, Kang YK, Nishida T, von Mehren M. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7:22.
5
von Mehren M, Kane JM, Riedel RF, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, Version 2.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20:1204-1214.
6
WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. Soft Tissue and BoneTumours. 5th ed. Lyon, France: IARC; 2020.
7
NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2024 Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors
8
Swerdlov M. Mezothelioma of the pelvic peritoneum resembling papillary cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1959;77:197-200.
9
Bloss JD, Brady MF, Liao SY, et al. Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: a phase II trial of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide with comparison to a cohort with papillary serous ovarian carcinoma-a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;89:148-154.
10
NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2024 Ovarian Cancer Including Fallopian Tube Cancer and Primary peritoneal cancer
11
NCCN Guidelines Version 2024 Mesothelioma:Peritoneal.
12
Miettinen M, Majidi M, Lasota J. Pathology and diagnostic criteria of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a review. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38:39-51.
13
Mantese G. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2019;35:555-559.
14
Chen T, Xu l, Dong X, et al. The roles of CT and EUS in the preoperative evaluation of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2 cm. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:2481-2489.
15
Burkill GJ, Badran M, Al-Muderis O, et al. Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor: distribution, imaging features, and pattern of metastatic spread. Radiology. 2003;226:527-532.
16
Hwang SH, Jung M, Jeong YH, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis on preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with localized primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Cancer Metab. 2021;9:8.
17
Von Mehren M, Kane JM, Bui MM, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 1.2021. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18:1604-1612.
18
Li S, Lin D, Tang M, Liu D, Lyu Q, Zhang J. Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for differentiating diagnosis between malignant and benign primary gastric gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors: a single-center retrospective study. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022;13:637-646.
19
Cho MH, Park CK, Park M, Kim WK, Cho A, Kim H. Clinicopathologic Features and Molecular Characteristics of Glucose Metabolism Contributing toF-fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0141413.
20
Ray-Coquard I, Montesco MC, Coindre JM, et al. Sarcoma: Concordance between initial diagnosis and centralized expert review in a population-based study within three European regions. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:2442-2449.
21
Narushima K, Shuto K, Okazumi S, et al. Malignant diagnosis and prognostic analysis of 89 GIST patients using preoperative FDG-PET. Sci Rep. 2023;13:2266.
22
Gayed I, Vu T, Iyer R, et al. The role of 18F-FDGPET in staging and early prediction of responseto therapy of recurrent gastrointestinalstromaltumors. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:17-21.
23
Call JW, Wang Y, Montoya D, Scherzer NJ, Heinrich MC. Correction to: survival in advanced GIST has improved over time and correlates with increased access to post-imatinib tyrosine kinase inhibitors: results from Life Raft Group Registry. Clin Sarcoma. Res 2019;9:7.
24
Nishino M, Jagannathan JP, Ramaiya NH, Van den Abbeele AD. Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: What oncologistswant to know and what radiologists need to know. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:281-289.
25
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:228-247.
26
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Ronellenfitsch U, Cheng C, et al. Imaging therapy response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) with FDG PET, CT and MRI: a systematic review. Clin Transl Imaging. 2017;5:183-197.
27
Choi H, Charnsangavej C, de Castro Faria S, et al. CT evaluation of the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after imatinib mesylate treatment: A quantitative analysis correlated with FDG PET findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1619-1628.
28
Vanel D, Albiter M, Shapeero L, et al. Role of computed tomography in the follow-up of hepatic and peritoneal metastases of GIST under imatinib mesylate treatment: A prospective study of 54 patients. Eur J Radiol. 2005;54:118-123.
29
Jager PL, Gietema JA, van der Graaf WT. Imatinib mesylate for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: best monitored with FDG PET. Nucl Med Commun. 2004;25:433-438.
30
Choi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria SC, et al. Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography inpatients with metastatic gastrointestinal stomal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1753-1759.
31
Shinto A, Nair N, Dutt A, Baghel NS. Early response assessment in gastrointestinal stromal tumors with FDG PET scan 24 hours after a single dose of imatinib. Clin Nucl Med. 2008;33:486-487.
32
Choi H. Response evaluation of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncologist. 2008;13(Suppl 2):4-7.
33
Tassinari E, Conci N, Battisti G, et al. Metabolic pseudoprogression in a patient with metastatic KIT exon 11 GIST after 1 month of first-line imatinib: a case report. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1310452.
34
Van den Abbeele AD, Badawi R, Manola J, et al. Effects of cessation of imatinib mesylate (IM) in patients with IM-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors as visualised by FDG PET scanning. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3012.
35
Qiu L, Lan L, Liu H, Deng J, Chen Y. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT detected non-FDG-avid gastric stromal tumor. Clin Nucl Med. 2022;47:226-227.
36
Wu C, Zhang X, Zeng Y, et al. [18F]FAPI‑42 PET/CT versus [ 18F]FDG PET/CT for imaging of recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;50:194-204.
37
Zhao W-Y, Zhuang C, Xu J, et al. Somatostatin receptors in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: new prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic strategy. Am J Transl Res. 2014;6:831-840.
38
Aloj L, Giger O, Mendichovszky IA, et al. The role of [68 Ga]Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in wild-type KIT/PDGFRA gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). EJNMMI Res. 2021;11:5.
39
Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Hohenberger P, Haberkorn U, Mäcke HR, Eisenhut M, Strauss LG. 68 Ga-labeled bombesin in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: comparison with 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1245-1250.
40
Gruber L, Decristoforo C, Uprimny C, et al. Imaging Properties and Tumor Targeting of 68Ga-NeoBOMB1, a Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Antagonist, in GIST Patients. Biomedicines. 2022;10:2899.
41
Bloss JD, Liao SY, Buller RE, et al. Extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma: A case-control retrospective comparison to papillary adenocarcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;50:347-351.
42
Dubreuil J, Giammarile F, Rousset P, et al. The role of 18F-FDG-PET/ceCT in peritoneal mesothelioma. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38:312-318.
43
Kuribayashi K, Kitajima K, Minami T, Ikeda M, Yamakado K, Kijima T. Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma Features Shown by FDG-PET/CT. Cancer Diagn Progn. 2022;2:654-660.
44
Carlson B, Harmath C, Turaga K, Kindler HL, Armato SG, Straus C. The role of imaging in diagnosis and management of malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: a systematic review. Abdom Radiol. 2022;47:1725-1740.
45
Domènech-Vilardell A, Rasiej MJ, Taub RN, Ichise M. Clinical utility of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography in malignantperitoneal mesothelioma. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;60:54-61.
46
Sponholtz SE, Mogensen O, Hildebrandt MG, Jensen PT. Clinical impact of pre-treatment FDG-PET/CT staging of primary ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers in women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99:186-195.
47
Ferdinandus J, Barbato F, Chodyla M, et al. Volumetric PET Response Assessment Outperforms Conventional Criteria in Patients Receiving High-Dose Pembrolizumab for Malignant Mesothelioma. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:191-194.
48
Gündoğan C, Güzel Y, Kömek H, Etem H, Kaplan İ. 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT in Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma. Clin Nucl Med. 2022;47:e113-e115.
49
Li J, Yang J, Hu S. Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma With Butterfly-Shaped Muscle Metastasis: 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT Versus 18F-FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2023;48:348-350.